Reports

A Step Forward in Gastroesophageal Disease Identification and Control

Paradigm Shift in the Treatment of Well-differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumours

This report is based on medical evidence presented at sanctioned medical congress, from peer reviewed literature or opinion provided by a qualified healthcare practitioner. The consumption of the information contained within this report is intended for qualified Canadian healthcare practitioners only.

MEDICAL FRONTIERS - 6th Annual ENETS Conference for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Neuroendocrine Tumor Disease

Granada, Spain / March 5-7, 2009

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) have generally been considered rare; however, as Prof. Kjell Öberg, Department of Endocrine Oncology, University Hospital Uppsala, Sweden, pointed out, “If we look at the data, the number of patients with all types of well-differentiated NETs has increased over the last 30 years.” To give an idea of the numbers involved in the European population, estimated at 850 million people, there are about 80,000 new cases per year with about 250,000 patients having such tumours at any one time. “This is a substantial tumour burden on physicians and therefore enormously important in terms of diagnosis and therapy,” explained Prof. Irvin Modlin, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

Symptoms Associated with NETs

In normal physiologic conditions, serotonin released by enterochromaffin cells modulates the secretion of water and electrolytes, gut motility and fibroblast proliferation. In functioning NETs, excessive release of serotonin and other substances is thought to be responsible for many of the symptoms such as diarrhea and flushing, and serious conditions like carcinoid heart disease. Serotonin release can be blocked by the action of antagonists at the somatostatin receptors on the enterochromaffin cells, and indeed, this is how somatostatin analogues such as octreotide work. “This control of symptoms had a large impact on patients’ quality of life,” stated Prof. Modlin. At present, new somatostatin analogues such as pasireotide are in development. This compound has high functional activity at sst1, 2, 3 and 5 receptors.

Beyond Symptom Control

Ever since octreotide started to be used to control symptoms, evidence from preclinical cancer models had been mounting that the compound might have antitumour activity (Weckbecker et al. Digestion 1996;57(Suppl 1):22-8). In a clinical setting, survival in patients with metastatic NETs increased after the introduction of this agent from 19 months (1973 to 1987) to 39 months (1988 to 2004) (Yao et al. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26(18):3063-72), which for Prof. Modlin was “evidence that for the first time outcomes were being altered.”

Advances in basic cell biology of NETs suggested a feasible mechanism by which somatostatin analogues might help restrict tumour growth through blockade of the pathways that induce cell growth and proliferation. However, solid evidence for such effects has been lacking.

PROMID: High-level Evidence for Antitumour Effects

The hypothesis that octreotide might have antiproliferative effects was tested in the randomized placebo-controlled PROMID (Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Prospective, Randomized Study on the Effect of Octreotide LAR in the Control of Tumor Growth in Patients with Metastatic Neuroendocrine Midgut Tumors). In total, 85 patients were treated between 2001 and 2008 (from a planned 162). Recruitment was stopped on the strength of the results, presented here, of the planned interim analysis.

The study population was well-defined—all patients had well-differentiated, non-functioning or functioning metastatic midgut NETs for which no other treatment was feasible, and all were treatment-naïve (Table 1). After screening, patients were randomized to receive either octreotide LAR 30 mg i.m. every 28 days or matching placebo for 18 months or until tumor progression (Figure 1). Figure 1.


Median time to tumour progression—the primary study end point—significantly favored active treatment at 14.3 months (95% CI: 11.0-28.8) for octreotide LAR vs. 6.0 months (95% CI: 3.7-9.4) for placebo (HR 0.34, 95% CI: 0.20-0.59, P=0.000072) (Figure 2). Tumour stabilization was shown in patients with functioning and non-functioning NETs. Tumour response at six months was demonstrated in 28/42 (67%) patients in the octreotide LAR group vs. 16/43 (37%) in the placebo group.

Importantly, subgroup analysis showed that improved outcomes compared to placebo were obtained regardless of CgA status and in patients with both functioning and non-functioning tumours. This latter result is important, as it would support the use of octreotide in asymptomatic patients. The effect seen for patients with hepatic tumour load <u>></u>10% was not statistically significant, although the numbers of patients were small (n=12 and n=11, respectively).

Overall survival was a secondary end point of the study; group differences could not be determined. “Almost all patients on placebo who progressed received octreotide, so we could not investigate overall survival in an octreotide-free population,” explained Dr. Arnold.

Enhanced Antitumour Effects

The mTOR inhibitor everolimus also interferes with pathways that induce cell growth and proliferation and preclinical models had shown evidence of antitumour activity. Data from a phase II trial presented here would seem to support that activity in a clinical setting. The study randomized patients with advanced pancreatic NET refractory to chemotherapy to receive everolimus monotherapy or combined with octreotide LAR. Durable objective response and stable disease were seen in both arms. Comparison with historical controls showed higher progression-free survival at six months (28% vs. 65% for everolimus and vs. 71% for everolimus/octreotide). “Everolimus is active, both as monotherapy and in combination with octreotide in refractory pancreatic NETs,” summarized Prof. James Yao, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Canadian Perspective

The feeling at the conference was that the results of the PROMID study would influence the European guidelines on the treatment of NETs. According to delegate Dr. Simron Singh, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, “We recently started reviewing the Canadian guidelines and we decided to include data from the PROMID study.” The PROMID study managed to obtain very clean data, in part because the study population was very well defined. Given that these studies are very hard to carry out, in Dr. Singh’s opinion, “I would be happy to extrapolate t
NETs.”

Table 1.

<img2972|center>

Although it appeared that findings were not as promising for patients with a high hepatic load, Dr. Walter Kocha, London Health Sciences Centre, Ontario, pointed out, “The number of patients with high hepatic load was low, which would make it harder to obtain statistically significant results. In any case, these results are not concordant with my experience in clinical practice; I have seen patients with high hepatic load who have responded extremely well.” In terms of other questions about the effects on clinical practice, Dr. Kocha considered that the question of when to start treatment was important. “If we start treatment early, we may be able to prevent some of these deaths,” he noted.

Summary

There is renewed hope for patients with NETs. For the first time, there is solid evidence that medical treatment with octreotide can extend time to tumour progression. These results will likely change the way physicians approach this patient population and open the way for the use of octreotide in patients with non-functioning tumours. In addition, further understanding of cell biology is being applied to the development of new therapies which should further pro
ove symptoms in these difficult-to-treat carcinomas.

Figure 2.

<img2969|center>

We Appreciate Your Feedback

Please take 30 seconds to help us better understand your educational needs.